A sub-thesis running throughout Prof. John Ahn’s Exile as Forced Migrations is the idea that social structures repeat; specifically for our purposes, that generational patterns of consciousness repeat throughout history, within radically different contexts. Ahn identifies two such contexts in the first chapter of his book: Hebrew Scriptural reaction to the Babylonian Exile, and the scholarship surrounding the Exile since the mid-19th century. In both settings, responses emerge from a first, second, and third generation, as well as a transitional, 1.5 generation. In the case of the Hebrew Bible, Ahn points to the 2 Kings account of the end of the Davidic covenant and the displacements of 597 and 587 BCE as the first generation response. This view of the Exile focuses on the people displaced (kings, rulers, skilled workers, etc), and sees the Exile as overwhelmingly negative. A second generation’s response is found in Jeremiah. Here displacements are described in stark figures, with no mention of class, presenting a less “caustic” or confrontational view (pg. 4). Jeremiah explains that this experience is part of God’s plan. Taking this one step further is Second Isaiah, who represents a third generation. This prophet emphasizes that the experience of exile is part of being made a “new creation,” and holds a constructive view of the situation.
- RT @BrandyLJensen: This George Strait profile is delightful newyorker.com/magazine/2017/… 2 hours ago
- RT @caityweaver: This video of Sean Spicer speaking English to the best of his ability still destroys me https://t.co/k0r3nqemJy 6 hours ago
- "the gambler" is a fucking banger don't @ me 1 day ago
- RT @Deadspin: Very good bat dog has identity crisis, chases after ball: deadsp.in/CGZfIEp https://t.co/UdestFP6nx 1 day ago
- RT @PhilipNByrne: When you're so high on dentist gas the Water Buffalo Of Drugs visits you. https://t.co/uqVHCVEoe4 1 day ago